![]() |
Suppressed correlative is a fallacy committed in an argument that attempts to redefine a correlative (one of two mutually exclusive options) so that one alternative encompasses the other, i.e. making one alternative impossible. This has also been known as the fallacy of lost contrast and the fallacy of the suppressed relative.
Note: It appears that, in contrast to the preceding two fallacies, the word “correlative” is used here to refer to one or another of the alternatives, rather than referring to the correlative conjunction. That is, this fallacy is the suppression of one of the alternatives in a correlative conjunction. A conceptual example:
The following two examples discuss well-known slogans from the novel 1984. Example 1:
Example 2:
Note: The redefinition is not always so obvious. At first glance it might appear reasonable to define brakes as “a method to quickly stop a vehicle”, however this permits all vehicles to be described as having brakes. Any car could be driven into a wall to stop it but that does not mean that every car has brakes. |
||
| or play.. |
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser. |
||
|
|
|||
